Document not completely obvious wxRearrangeList::Set() behaviour
Calling Set() resets the existing items order, which makes sense from the implementation point of view, but not necessarily expected by the users. See #18262.
This commit is contained in:
parent
f257780771
commit
f11849b7e8
1 changed files with 6 additions and 0 deletions
|
|
@ -41,6 +41,12 @@
|
|||
is to use wxRearrangeCtrl which combines it with two standard buttons to
|
||||
move the current item up or down.
|
||||
|
||||
Note that while most of the methods for items manipulation such as
|
||||
Append(), Insert() or Delete(), inherited from wxItemContainer work as
|
||||
expected for this class, Set() somewhat unexpectedly resets the order of
|
||||
the items as it clears the control first, also clearing the order as a side
|
||||
effect, before adding the new items.
|
||||
|
||||
@since 2.9.0
|
||||
|
||||
@library{wxcore}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue